Widespread usage of the Internet services in all over the world has resulted in implementation of the Internet censorship -restrictions on what can be publicized or viewed on the Internet- and the surveillance society in many countries. The Internet access restrictions and censorship are being used by some governments to control and suppress individuals sharing and reaching information on the Internet. In this study, following a theoretical discussion based on the review of relevant literature, individuals' perceptions related to the Internet censorship in Turkey is demonstrated based on a qualitative research in the form of semi-structured interviews. The findings of the study revealed that the Internet censorship is considered as a major obstacle restricting individuals freedom of getting information, sharing their opinions and communicating with others. Furthermore, internet users implement self-censorship while posting their opinions about especially political issues since they feel fear, anxiety and pressure stemming from restrictions and surveillance.


Internet Censorship, Freedom of Speech, Online Communication, Internet Access, The Surveillance Society

Full Text:



Aceto, G., & Pescapé, A. (2015). Internet censorship detection: A survey. Computer Networks, 83(4 June 2015): 381-421.

Akdeniz, Y. (2010). Report of the OSCE representative on freedom of the media on Turkey and internet censorship. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. Available at: http://www.osce.org/fom/41091 (Accessed: 3 April 2017)

Akdeniz, Y., & Alt?parmak, K. (2008). Internet: restricted access. A critical assessment of internet content regulation and censorship in Turkey. Available at: http://www.cyber-rights.org/reports/internet_restricted_bw.pdf (Accessed: 3 April 2017)

Akgül, M., & K?rl?do?, M. (2015). Internet censorship in Turkey. Internet Policy Review, 4(2). Available at: http://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/internet-censorship-turkey (Accessed: 3 April 2017).

Arsan, E. (2013). Killing me softly with his words: Censorship and self-censorship from the perspective of Turkish journalists. Turkish Studies, 14(3), 447-463.

Bitso, C., Fourie, I., & Bothma, T. J. D. (2013). Trends in transition from classical censorship to Internet censorship: Selected country overviews. Innovation: Journal of Appropriate Librarianship and Information Work in Southern Africa, 2013(46), 166-191.

Brown, I., & Korff, D. (2009). Terrorism and the proportionality of internet surveillance. European Journal of Criminology, 6(2): 119-134.

Chu, C.-W. (2017). Censorship or protectionism? Reassessing China’s regulation of internet industry. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 7(1), 28-32.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

Freedom House (2016). Freedom on the net 2016 Turkey. Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FOTN%202016%20Turkey.pdf (Accessed: 3 April 2017)

Fuchs, C., Boersma, K., Albrechtslund, A., & Sandoval, M. (2011). “Internet and Surveillance”. In Fuchs, C., Boersma, K., Albrechtslund, A., & Sandoval, M. (Eds.), Internet and Surveillance: The Challenges of Web 2.0 and Social Media, New York: Routledge, pp. 1-28.

Garfinkel, S. (2000). Database nation: The death of privacy in the 21st century. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.

Klein, N. (2008). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. London, UK: Penguin.

Köse, G., & Özen, K. (2010). “Internet'te sansür üzerine bir de?erlendirme”. In Kurbano?lu, S. et al. (Eds.). Bilgi Yönetiminde Teknolojik Yak?nsama ve Sosyal A?lar: 2. Uluslararas? De?i?en Dünyada Bilgi Yönetimi Sempozyumu, 22-24 Eylül 2010, Ankara, Türkiye, Bildiriler (Technological Convergence and Social Networks in Information Management: 2nd International Symposium on Information Management in a Changing World, September 22-24, 2010, Ankara, Turkey, Proceedings), pp. 113-122.

Liang, B., & Lu, H. (2010). Internet development, censorship, and cyber crimes in China. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(1): 103–120.

Lyon, D. (2008). "Filtering flows, friends, and foes: Global surveillance". In Salter, M. B. (Ed.), Politics at the Airport, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 29-50.

Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J. and McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship: the internet, society, and participation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Murakami Wood, D., & Webster, C. W. R. (2009). Living in surveillance societies: The normalisation of surveillance in Europe and the threat of Britain’s bad example. Journal of Contemporary European Research. 5 (2): 259-273.

Ozkan, H., & Arikan, A. (2009). Internet censorship in Turkey: University students' opinions. World Journal on Educational Technology, 1(2009): 46-56.

Stevenson, C. (2007). Breaching the great firewall: China’s internet censorship and the quest for freedom of expression in a connected world, 30 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev., 30(2): 531-558.

Taneja, H., & Wu, A. X. (2014). Does the Great Firewall really isolate the Chinese? Integrating access blockage with cultural factors to explain web user behavior. Information Society, 30(5), pp. 297-309.

Wang, D., & Mark, G. (2015). Internet censorship in China: Examining user awareness and attitudes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 22(6), Article 31, 1-22.

Wojcieszak, M. Smith, B. (2014). Will politics be tweeted? New media use by Iranian youth in 2011. New Media & Society, 16(1), 91-109.

Wright, J. & Breindl, Y. (2013). Internet filtering trends in liberal democracies: French and German regulatory debates. Internet Policy Review, 2(2). DOI: 10.14763/2013.2.122

Xu, X., Mao, Z. M., & Halderman, J. A. (2011). "Internet Censorship in China: Where Does the Filtering Occur?" In Spring, N. & Riley, G. (Eds.), Passive and Active Measurement 12th International Conference, PAM 2011 Atlanta, GA, USA, March 20-22, 2011 Proceedings, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 133-142.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17349/jmc117306


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Media Critiques [JMC]

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.