A 3-Factor Model Relating Communication to Risk Mitigation of Extended Information System Failover

Athanasios Podaras

Abstract


This paper aims to analyse the relation between timely and effective communication and risk mitigation of late recovery after an unexpected information system outage in enterprises. An unforeseen information system failure in modern enterprise units, may result to significant operational and financial damage. In such a critical incident, effective communication between the team leaders and the recovery team involved, can minimize or even eliminate this negative impact. An extended information system outage can be perceived as a time deviation from the Maximum Accepted Outage (???) timeframe, proposed by the business continuity management, according to the value of which dependent business functions may be interrupted without any serious effects to the company. The paper examines the relation between 3 basic factors and the efficient communication between team members. The factors are: timely information distribution, staff availability and network availability. Through the current paper, the author proposes a risk analysis model, based on the Composite Risk Index theory of Risk Management, which can significantly diminish the possibility of an extended information system outage, as well as calculate the extended time required to recover a system when the aforementioned factors emerge in their worst form. The precise calculation of recovery time can be achieved via the execution of business continuity tests which include scenarios, according to which an unexpected system outage coexists with delayed information distribution as well as low staff and network availability.


Keywords


Extended Information System Outage; Risk Mitigation; Effective Communication; Information System Recovery; Composite Risk Index;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adkins G. L., Thornton G. L. & Blake K. (2009), ‘A Content Analysis Investigating Relationships Between Communication And Business Continuity Planning’, Journal of Business Communication 2009, DOI: 10.1177/0021943609333525;

Antlová, K., Popelínský, L., Tandler, J. (2011), ‘Long Term Growth Of SME from the View Of ICT Competencies and Web Presentations’, Ekonomie A Management 2011, 4;

Borghesi, A. & Gaudenzi, B. (2013). ‘Risk Management, Perspectives in Business culture, Springer-Verlag, Italia, DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-2531-8_6;

Business Standard Institute (2012). BS ISO 22301 : 2012;

Castillo, C. (2004), ‘Disaster Preparedness and Business Continuity Planning at Boeing: An Integrated Model’ Journal of Facilities Management 2004, 1:3;

Ciobanu, M. & Mazilu, M. (2011), ‘Environmental Crisis Management through Risk Management, Recent Researches in Tourism and Economic Development:.In WSEAS 1st International Conference on Tourism and Economic Development (TED '11), Romania;

Gibson, D. (2010). Managing Risks in Information Systems, Jones & Bartlett Learning;

Gill, T. J. (2006), ‘Workplace continuity: How Risk and Technology will affect facilities strategy’, Journal of Facilities Management 2006, 4;

Herbane B., Elliott B. & Swartz E. M., (2004). ‘Business Continuity Management: Time for a Strategic Role?’, Long Range Planning 2004, 5:37;

Holmes E. M. & Engemann K.J. (2012). Using Analytical Methods in Business Continuity Planning. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg , LNBIP 115, pp. 2-12;

ISO 31000, (2009). Risk Analysis;

Jackson, R. (2006). Business continuity: Preparation over prevention. Accountancy Ireland, 38: 51-53;

Lindell, M. K. (2011), ‘Disaster Studies’, URL: http://www.sagepub.net/isa/resources/pdf/Disaster%20Studies.pdf, Texas A&M University, DOI: 10.1177/205684601111;

Mitroff, I. & Anagnos, G. (2001). Managing Crises before They Happen: What Every Executive Manager Needs to Know about Crisis Management, New York: AMACOM;

Piedad, F. & Hawkins, M. (2001). High availability design techniques and processes, New Jersey: Prentice Hall - Inc.;

Philippa, G., Navendu, J. & Nachiappan, N. (2011), ‘Understanding Network Failures in Data Centers: Measurement, Analysis and Implications’, In SIGCOMM '11, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

University Of Michigan- Information & Technology Sevices (ITS) (2014), ‘ Disaster Recovery/Business Continuity’, URL:http://www.mais.umich.edu/search_results.php?cx=013541196959893833844%3Aunxac5bpi7w&cof=FORID%3A10&ie=UTF-8&q=www.mais.umich.edu%2F...%2FT-BC8000-exercise-templat;




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17349/jmc115107

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Media Critiques [JMC]