Maria Vaxevanidou


The aim of this study is to explore the means, the methods, and the techniques of public diplomacy that a country in crisis, such as Greece, should use. The paper addresses the very issues of whether a country in crisis can conduct public diplomacy and whether it should be recognized as a legitimate and powerful actor in the field. In a broader sense, it focuses on the processes that a country should follow and how a better understanding and framing of its situation, principles, and policy can be provided. A crucial factor for such countries is the choice of communication channels, which includes traditional tools like press releases, letters to editor, editorials, interviews, or more active tools like social media, events, campaigns, and networking. In this paper, three dimensions of public diplomacy are examined, and appropriate tools to be developed in the short, medium and long-term are proposed. The results of the study are based on case studies, methods, and tools employed by Greece during the last years that the country has faced a huge economic crisis. There is a short presentation on the methods that Greece tries to adopt in order to enhance its image worldwide.

Keywords: reactive public diplomacy, proactive public diplomacy, relationship building


reactive public diplomacy, proactive public diplomacy, relationship building

Full Text:



Anholt, S. (2006). Public diplomacy and place branding: Where’s the link? Place Branding, 2, 271-275.

Pincus, A. (2007). How to build relationships with the media, available:

Crow, R. M. (2003). Strategies of public diplomacy: An assessment of the current U.S. public diplomacy strategy in light of a directional, elite-oriented model and two historical cases. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Europees Parlement (2014). Huis van Europa, Informatiebureau in Nederland, Lecture: “The other face of the Euro crisis” available:

Frangonikolopoulos, C. (2012). Public diplomacy: How to think about and improve Greece's “neglected” component of foreign policy in times of economic crisis. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 8, 185–193. doi:10.1057/pb.2012.14

Kimonye M. (2014). Managing a nation brand during crisis. available:

Lambropoulos V. (2014). How Cavafy became from writer to a field, Avgi newspaper,

L’Etang, J. (2009). Public relations and diplomacy in a globalized world: An issue of public communication. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(4), 607-626.

Leonard M., Stead, C., & Smewing, C. (2002). Public diplomacy. London: The Foreign Policy Centre.

Luttbeg, N. R. (1968). Public opinion and public policy models of political linkage. Homewood: The Dorsey Press.

Melissen J. (2011). Beyond the new public diplomacy. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Public Research “Clingendael.”

Melissen, J. (2005). New public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations. Basingstoke [UK]: New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Miller, D. B. (2007). Media pressure on foreign policy: The evolving theoretical framework. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Roberts, W. R. (2007). What is public diplomacy? Past practices, present conduct, possible future. Mediterranean Quarterly, 18(4), 36-52.

Secretary General of Information and Communication (2014), Events organised by the Press and Communication Office in Hague - 2014 & 2015,

Wendling, C., Radisch, J., & Jacobzone, S. (2013). The use of social media in risk and crisis communication. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 24, OECD Publishing.

Waller, J. M. (2007). The public diplomacy reader. Washington DC: The Institute of World Political Press.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Media Critiques [JMC]

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.